Narh it would be similar to how it is now, I would have to give current accounts two or whatever to compensate for the changes. I'm not quite sure I understand how u mean to do this as Ive not played long enough to experience a free reallocation being handed out before. But if say you are giving 2 ...

. I mean what do you want next class changes when classes get updated and balanced? No i dont. If you read my posts carefully you'd see im against class changes. That's cos when players choose a class they generally know what they are getting into (ie an assassin is a dps character, barb is a melee...

Normally bad choices are to do 'mostly' with stats and not races. I know there have been some people who used the completely wrong race for the class (lets say a elemental slayer, doesn't exist, but that's an extreme. If anything, if something like this was 'introduced', it would be more like your ...

Because being able to change races would dynamically make everyone cooker cutters and set everyone to a set few races. I don't think it would be fun or good at all if everyone was the same. Everyone would abuse it, specially vets, to change their characters into more useful ones. I disagree that ra...

Just a clarificational reply to Eld (and somewhat JF and Lat) to make clear that I am not saying Silh are all in agreement or trying to influence for their benefit etc (I was merely pointing out to NH that he has large blindspots in his information about his own game if he's only relying on MBs/disc...

You won't be able to change race ever, balance is part of the game. If people are upset it's a shame, but it is what it is. We'll have to get new people in place of that. We haven't really been advertising and probably won't be until we're more settled. I'm not sure why you would adopt such a stanc...

P.S. Put both proposes here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15EUNEHza_TEiL4Qw-RofGVNX1mcBPQ0T9Ri8pB3EfXA/edit#gid=0 There's also a possibility of if you remove the max end you could bump all END by lets say 10-30HP too with the above. Not a great fan of either proposal tbh and think both ar...

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15EUNEHza_TEiL4Qw-RofGVNX1mcBPQ0T9Ri8pB3EfXA/edit?usp=sharing Fucking around based on your values and mine, maybe that would be better on what is there now? I thought your original proposal better... The fighter races side of spectrum seem to work ok and don't...

DE and Elf definetly need a +1 END, imo. I agree. I feel if you give gnomes +1 end but don't elves a corresponding +1 end then ppl could theoretically choose gnome and +1 agi to make a better spellcaster than best elf (and if you reduce the gnome pool points to try and avoid this it may prevent ppl...

Just to clarify (in order to help us consider better), are you proposing the above changes with no changes to the current amount of allocatable points for each race? Eg gnomes still have 109 usable points and therefore could still afford to +1 INT to achieve 24int etc?