Terron wrote:a pk ninja with less than a half % chance to hit 5 for 5 and still do less damage than an average slayer hitting 2x. im not saying a slayer cant be the best pker around and have major solo value, just at the moment its a tad excessive.
i didnt even say they need removed its just the game is 1 sided in their favor right now. the class can all be lizards and even kill their theoretical weakness. as chanters still cant round them and need to hit 7-8 times which can be 3+ rounds vs 10 wis.
for the time being a str brigand(x3) is plenty of damage, slayer is overkill. until theres more mage types(some with burst damage) and some other burst damage melee classes to offer competition slayer is way out of proportion.
- 1vs1 in a fair duel, a 25er slayer can be beaten by lots of classes (trust me i know)
- You are neglecting the level of the target, also. Its completely different when we are talking about a lvl 25 vs a lvl 16, or a lvl 25 vs a lvl 24 (mind you, lvl 24 sorcs can beat lvl 25 saurians, and not make it even close)
The reason you see many lizards is because people don't invest in enchanters - and therefore people don't invest in high MR slayers/ninja's, such as halflings. Its not a question of strength, i positively s*** myself when i see Xpose around, and i wont attack enchanter's (or elder druids).